I have a lot to share about this concept in the coming months. Expect to see an interview with Hubster about the changes he's made to the existing framework that will allow for future wearable tech, our favorite blood sugar pattern management apps, and even future CGM technology that's coming down the pike to provide us our data in different formats.
It's my data. If I can see it in a format I can understand and I can make inferences from it, I can manage my numbers better.
Case in point.
I've been seeing higher numbers creep up on me first thing in the morning. My fasting blood sugar has been "floating the rumble line" as I call it and twirling itself around my upper threshold. If I forget to bolus insulin for my morning coffee, I'm riding much higher by breakfast. Many mornings, if I look back, I might notice that my numbers stayed steady in a safe-for-sleeping range followed by a gradual bump midway through the night. That bump is a bit murky for me sometimes. Hard to see the time, the values, the minutiae.
I'm supposed to be able to dive into that data and evaluate what could be changed. Otherwise I wait three months of seeing this over and over again before discussing it with my diabetes educator or my endocrinologist. One of them will lean toward the screen and stare at a tangled mess of lines and determine the same thing I should be able to determine myself...if I examine the data in a way that makes sense to my brain.
Do you know what makes sense to my brain? Numbers.
Using Nightscout, I can scroll through my night and pinpoint exactly when I had my first out-of-sync data point because I can see the numeric values and they are timestamped. At 2:40am, the first reading that wasn't between 129 and 132 popped up: 134. Not concerning in and of itself. 25min later at 3:05am, it was 139. Again, not worth a great deal of worry. Except at 3:14am, 144. 3:27am, 152. 20min later 174. By 4am, 176. This is how a blood sugar creeps.
What is important to understand is not that any one method of reading this data is better than another, but that this particular method is a platform for delivering that data to me in a way that makes sense to how I personally process the data. Dr. Ponder, whom I admire and support, can read his graph lines with a kind of precision that I cannot. But I can understand when I see a 130 creep to a 176 from 3am-4am. And I can make an adjustment by shifting that pre-dawn basal rate back an hour. Now this is what I see when I look at my Dexcom screen:
This is taking SMBG (self-monitoring of blood glucose) to an empowering point. I am not manipulating my data. I'm understanding the language of my data.
And that's why I need you to take less time than it took to read my silly blog post and tell FDA that it's a great idea to fasttrack the regulatory process as they are proposing in the draft guidance for MDDS - or Mobile Device Data Systems - second screens like Nightscout and mobile apps that facilitate “the electronic transfer or exchange of medical device data from a medical device without altering the function or parameters of any connected devices.”
You have a story. You have a voice. Both are unique and powerful. FDA wants to hear our stories.